Without music, life is a journey through a desert.

"I think music in itself is healing. It's an explosive expression of humanity. It's something we are all touched by. No matter what culture we're from, everyone loves music."
-Billy Joel-
I personally have a neutral stance when it comes to the digital rights management debate. I can reason with both the consumer as well as the artist in this argument. As a cosumer, I believe that we should have the right to download music so long as we are doing so for our own personal pleasure and entertainment and not as a form of profit. Most of the time when consumers think about downloading music its usually because 1. the cost of the album is over priced or 2. there's usually only 1 of 2 songs out of the entire album that actually sounds good. Why inconvenience your consumers when half the time the 1 or 2 singles that have been aired are the only good songs on the entire CD?
As far as the creators and artist of this music, I think they too have a valid argument only because this is their means of survivial. The production of music is their career and most of them make a living off of it. If consumers continue to download their music at no cost the artist will in the long run see a decrease in the profits made from their music. Though this may be unfortunate I think there are many ways this can be prevented by the artist, whether it be changing the content of their music or releasing more singles or demos of the albums so that consumers can be motivated to purchase the album at its cost.
I'm sure there's a happy medium somewhere out there its just a matter of time before it gets figrued out. But until then I guess the debate will continue and many consumers will continue to share music files while creators continue to be irrate about the situation.
Will it ever be a win-win scenario? Only time will tell!
